|
Post by Discoalucard on Mar 17, 2015 19:31:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Gendo Ikari on Mar 19, 2015 3:50:41 GMT -5
From my memories of mid-'95, the nAmiga and Mega Drive versions were released more or less concurrently, so the lack of details in the former may be due to limits that the programmers did not havevthe ability or time to circumvent.
As much as I love the isometric perspective, I have to agree it's not the best on a gameplay standpoint (recently experimented that with Bastion and Back to Bed).
The article does not go in-depth about the version differencies, especially jarring since the single screenshot of the CD32 version shows a surprising amount of additional detail. Is it just a prettier Amiga version? Or has it the content of the MD one? How is the soundtrack?
|
|
|
Post by Discoalucard on Mar 19, 2015 8:36:43 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure the Amiga and Amiga CD version are identical, it's just that version specifically was used for the screenshot comparison.
|
|
|
Post by Gendo Ikari on Mar 19, 2015 13:04:59 GMT -5
Ah, I see. From a Youtube search of the game, it looks like the soundtrack of the CD32 version is an high-quality remix of the Amiga disk one (the author is the same for both). So the Megadrive version looks a bit less pretty in screenshots but it's still the better one.
|
|
|
Post by gzegzolka on Mar 20, 2015 6:17:30 GMT -5
I remember that game, it's very strong "avarage" game, not brilliant, and not totally bad. It's just avarage game. I like how look first and final level, they have that "nice" dark and gloomy metal feel so well described in Your review. Saddly I played amiga version, now I have see Megadrive on YT. It's still same game, but with more details and better boss parts.
|
|
|
Post by TΛPETRVE on Feb 15, 2016 12:16:51 GMT -5
Guess I'm the odd one out, then, who prefers the Amiga version's soundtrack.
|
|